After the first round of the 2020 Unexplored Junior

This is a 1PM opinion based on my review of the applications. I am not talking about a specific application, but rather about the characteristics I saw in several applications.

Let's make it PDF

What is PDF?

Portable Document Format

A format that is intended to look the same regardless of OS (Windows, Mac, Linux)

Unexplored Junior solicitation instructs proposals to be in PDF format.

But there were a few applications that were just Word files with the extension changed to pdf.

This time I converted it back to PDF on my end, so it didn't affect the review process.

But if the format is different from the specification, you can't complain about being ignored.

I'm just pointing out that it would be a shame to be ignored when I apply for other projects in the future in my life.

The title should be a one-line summary.

There were a number of applications with coined product names, something like "FooBarBaz (tentative).

The first place the reader sees the proposal is where it says what the reader doesn't understand.

I was thinking that maybe our side should add something to next year's application template, like "Please describe your project in one line" or something like that.

Let's consider making a video.

Seeing is believing.

Wouldn't images and videos convey the message better than words alone? Let's think about it.

Especially when there is a prototype

Sending a program or source code is no guarantee that it will work the same way it does at your end.

The program alone doesn't tell me what kind of behavior you want me to focus on.

Modern OSes have a standard screen video capture function.

YouTube

The URL can be set to be visible only to those who know it (unlisted).

Gyazo GIF

If you want to explain a little behavior, this is also easy

Dropbox

Good for when you have multiple videos.

Just put the video and write the folder sharing link in the proposal.

Video can be replaced even after submitting a proposal (not possible with the top two).

Let's dig into specifics.

The way you speak to people who don't understand technology is different from the way you speak to people who do.

When explaining what you want to do to someone who understands technology, don't look at articles on the Internet "for people who don't understand technology" and copy them.

Those articles don't tell the detailed story of "how it was accomplished." That's because "non-technical readers" don't want that information.

Instead, we use words (buzzwords) that even "non-technical readers" know and that have an air of new technology. The most popular word of the past few years has been "artificial intelligence.

I saw a proposal that said, "I will solve this problem with artificial intelligence! I saw a proposal that said, "Artificial Intelligence to solve this problem! That's amazing! I don't think, "Wow! I think, "How exactly is it going to do that?" I think, "How exactly is it going to be done?

Since you are the one who will do this project, you must be able to explain "what exactly you will do starting tomorrow".

To those who failed the first round, this does not mean that we should not proceed with your project. We can't interview every project we want to support. After this PM will write a message or article on the rejected projects. We hope you will find it helpful and continue down the path you want to go down.

Article by PM Teramoto

Video of Yaskawa PM

---